Research protocol

How Casinova Signal researches claims

Every material claim is assigned a source role, date and confidence level. Conflicts remain visible instead of being averaged into false certainty.

Primary legal source
ACMA
Trend source
Blask
Brand facts
Cross-checked
Ratings schema
Not used
01

Source hierarchy

Regulators lead legal conclusions. Provider or independent market datasets lead game mechanics and trend signals. Independent review databases supply dated brand, limit and complaint records. Affiliate pages can reveal a claim but do not prove it.

02

Conflict handling

When catalogue counts, entities or licence records disagree, the page names the conflict and gives the reader the field needed to resolve it. We do not choose the largest number or most convenient claim.

03

Corrections and scope

The review date appears site-wide. Significant corrections should update the relevant page and source list. This is desk research; it is not a real-money account test and does not measure field Core Web Vitals after deployment.

Evidence checklist

  • Legal claims use regulator sources.
  • Commercial claims require cross-checking.
  • Unresolved conflicts remain labelled.
  • No fake score is turned into structured data.